I was reading a post yesterday that showed several social media sites without compliant code. It’s been thought that Google will penalize for poor site structure and non-compliant markup and CSS. But do they? It’s tough to say… but I did a bit of research and found that it may not make much difference to have compliant code…
Youtube:
Markup: Failed validation, 72 Errors
CSS: Sorry! We found the following errors (51)
Additional to code errors, YouTube hasn’t implemented a 301 redirect… Do they need to?
Here’s some more interested data…
Tags: w3c, markup, validation, youtube, 301 redirect
Hello,
We wanted to introduce ourselves to you & the Joomla community. We are a new company called Joomlatools, focused on building applications for Joomla users that want professional, extendable open source extensions. All of our extensions will be built from the ground up with lots of user feedback, tried and tested by real customers and professionally written by folks who helped create Joomla!
Our team consists of both experienced Joomla developers (Johan Janssens – major contributor to Joomla 1.5, Mathias Verraes – major contributor to DOCman and Shayne Bartlett – major contributor to LETTERman) and other open source contributors (Laurens Vandeput – Eclipse, Joomla) and Amit Shah (co-founder and VP Business Development of OpenX).
Our first application is called Nooku and is focused on helping Joomla users create multi-lingual websites easily, with integrated user workflow and translation management. Nooku fits seamlessly into Joomla 1.5 and is both an extension and a framework. To fund the application development needed to create this extension we have invited members of the Joomla community to contribute funds to employ our team of developers.
We would love your help in getting the word out about Joomlatools and our first application, Nooku. Please let me know if you would like to learn more about Joomlatools or our applications in development.
Regards,
Amit
Sage-like. I bet you predicted $200/bbl oil, as well.
Great comparison.
Great, so one of you might actually qwork on vTiger so it’s issue with blank pages after installation is gone forever and it’s buggy code replaced, and the other one can work on horribly exploitable Joomla, which we constantly have to clean for tens of clients out of exploits and injections regardless of the PHP setup and security. vTiger is of course much better than Joomla, but Joomla is a joke.
Been testing both. SugarCRM is a beast. Seems to me to be very user-unfriendly.
You install it and there is not much I was able to do with it. Ie, what I needed from it like web-to-lead forms, customer service portal and workflow were not available without purchasing those components. A freemium business model is fine by me — but if you can’t test drive the components and see how and if it works for your business case — that’s not good. And adds to the headache.
I get the sense that SugarCRM has experienced a fit of feature bloat and the owners have decided to make huge, fundamental components (mentioned above) as paid software.
Vtiger on the other hand, may not be as robust as a full pro or enterprise edition SugarCRM — but I’m almost glad. It makes for a much easier, more productive environment in which to work.
Yes the redundant modules within the tabs are silly (tabs are organized by employee role like ‘marketing’, ’sales’ etc so their submenu items have redundancies) but that’s minor.
Main thing is: which have I been able to do more with in a short amount of setup and development time? Vtiger.
Installation: both were pretty easy. For some vtiger modules you do need to edit some file config values here and there but wasn’t too bad.
Ease of use — and ease of setting it up to do what you need it to do — is paramount I think – because the most robust app in the world doesn’t do you business any good if folks don’t like working with it. Vtiger wins hands down in this category.